|
51a Hibiscus Coast Highway,
Silverdale, Auckland
Phone 09 4274541
Fax 09 4274542
Mobile 021969159
Email robert@missioncontrol.net.nz
TARGET SHOOTING
FOR THE DISABLED
ROBERT BERGER
I was introduced to target shooting for
the disabled by Michael Johnson, current world champion. I became a paraplegic
in 1975 after losing contact with my motorcycle seat at 60 miles per hour
and gaining more contact with the steel crash barrier on the side of the
road, but that's another story. During my rehab in the Otara Spinal Unit
(Auckland New Zealand) I looked at several sports but because I was not
into basketball, rugby or sport at all I moved on to other things such
as running my own business.
Early in 2007, I had a go at target shooting with an air rifle. I was
coached by Michael for a while using a borrowed gun from Parafed Auckland.
After a short time, I decided to get more serious about the sport and
bought my own rifle. Once I had my new Feinwerkbau 700 rifle I became
more competitive and practiced harder.
My first job was to gain some Minimum Qualifying Standards (MQS). I had
to shoot a score of 570 in standing and 575 in prone twice, to be allowed
to compete in Australia. As a wheelchair user, standing is not quite the
right description, but what it means is that you sit holding the rifle
without any support from your elbows resting on the table. Prone is a
similar position but with your elbows on the table. I eventually managed
to get the MQS and I was invited to be part of the New Zealand Paralympic
Shooting Team competing in the Oceania 2007 Event at the Sydney International
Shooting Complex.
Although I came home without any medals, I came home with an international
competition under my belt, a stack of experience and a whole lot of new
friends.
Now the drama begins.
A couple of years before I took up target shooting I had a heart attack,
bypass surgery and had to go on a drug regime that included a Beta-blocker
called metoprolol. This is a banned drug in shooting and according to
WADA, (World Anti Doping Agency) has the ability to give a shooter an
advantage over their competition. I dont disagree that a perfectly healthy
person with a perfectly healthy heart would have reduced heart rate, but
if they took a betablocker they would be a drug cheat. To shoot on a Beta-blocker
a shooter must be granted a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE). I applied
to the International Paralympic Committee (IPC) for a TUE and included
a 24 hour halter monitor test which is a 24 hour recording of heart activity
similar to an ECG. This showed that my heart rate was always higher than
normal and should be proof that I did not have an advantage over other
athletes. The 3 criteria set out by WADA to be met before a TUE may be
granted are:
4.2 The Athlete would experience a significant
impairment to health if the
Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method were to be withheld in the course
of treating an acute or chronic medical condition.
4.3 The therapeutic Use of the Prohibited
Substance or Prohibited Method
would produce no additional enhancement of performance other than that
which might be anticipated by a return to a state of normal health following
the treatment of a legitimate medical condition.
4.4 There is no reasonable therapeutic
alternative to the Use of the
otherwise Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
International
Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemption, effective from Jan 1st 2009.pdf
(134 KB)
IPC and WADA agree that I satisfy 4.2
and 4.4. However Both IPC and WADA say that I have fail to prove 4.3.
Despite providing two complete 24 hour halter monitor tests which show
that my heart rate never falls to a state of normal. I feel that the tests
show this in black and white. However WADA then introduced a 20 year old
study on "Healthy" shooters none of which had a heart condition.
This study showed that only some of the shooters shot a better match while
on a Beta-blocker. Not all those on the Beta-blockers showed an improvement
and all those in the test started out with a normal heart rhythm. As could
be expected the participants who were given a beta-blocker had a reduction
in heart rate and because there heart rate was already normal they may
gain an improvement in their shooting. In my case the constant higher
than normal heart rate proved that the beta blocking effect of the drug
Metoprolol (Betaloc) was not in fact blocking the beta receptors as well
as it should even though I was on the highest possible dose. This means
that the prohibited substance or prohibited method did not produce additional
enhancement of performance other than that which might be anticipated
by a return to a state of "normal health".
WADA and IPC both believe that I failed
to prove this fact and completely dismissed the halter monitor tests as
not sufficient evidence.
I took my appeal to the Court of Arbitration
for Sport (CAS) with the full support of Paralympics New Zealand (PNZ)
. CAS listened to the evidence and the short story is that CAS accepted
WADA's statement, where WADA "suspected" that I may have
reduced hand tremor as a result of taking a Beta-blocker. WADA can only
speculate because there is no test for hand tremor. WADA goes on to say
that I have to prove that I do not have reduced hand tremor. On one hand
WADA note that there is no possibility of testing for reduced hand tremor,
but on the other hand say that I must prove that I do not have a reduction
in hand tremor. To see the CAS Award click this link.
Download
CAS 2008/A/1574 Appeal by Robert Berger v World Anti-Doping Authority.pdf
Has WADA taken the Anti Doping Code too
far? Are they destroying the shooting career of a disabled athlete because
he has a disability? Should the Anti Doping Code be different for disabled
athletes that have to take certain drugs to stay alive? Tetraplegic Shooters
are allowed to take a drug to reduce their spasms, returning them to a
state of normal or close to normal health. Is this the same as a cardiac
victim taking a life saving drug that does not even return him to a state
of normal health? Have the drug cheats screwed it up for genuine athletes?
Why would WADA let someone go through the whole TUE application knowing
full well that they will not allow Beta-blockers in sports such as shooting
and archery? Should WADA make the statement, "Beta-blockers are not
permitted in shooting under any circumstances, so we will not accept any
TUE applications for Beta-blockers"? Do they have the balls to do
that?

This Web Site is Copyrighted, copying or using any part or parts of this
web site without express permission in writing from the website owners is
prohibited.
|